Loading PDF...
Chapter Analysis
Intermediate13 pages • EnglishQuick Summary
The chapter on 'Social Justice' in the NCERT Political Science textbook for Class 11 emphasizes the concepts of justice and equality in society. It explores different philosophical perspectives, such as those of John Rawls, who proposed the 'veil of ignorance' as a means to achieve fair distribution. The text delves into principles like equal treatment, proportionate justice, and the recognition of special needs, highlighting the complex interplay between equity, merit, and societal responsibilities. This chapter argues that justice is essential for maintaining harmony and fairness within a society.
Key Topics
- •Different philosophical interpretations of justice
- •John Rawls’ Theory of Justice
- •Principles of distributive justice
- •Role of government in social justice
- •Economic disparities and justice
- •Recognition of special needs in justice
- •Justice as fairness versus utilitarian justice
- •Social justice in multicultural societies
Learning Objectives
- ✓Understand the principles of justice proposed in different societies.
- ✓Explain the concept of distributive justice.
- ✓Discuss John Rawls’ arguments for a fair and just society.
- ✓Analyze the role of government in ensuring social justice.
- ✓Evaluate different perspectives on economic disparity and justice.
- ✓Recognize the importance of equality in the pursuit of justice.
Questions in Chapter
What does it mean to give each person his/her due? How has the meaning of 'giving each his due' changed over time?
Page 66
Briefly discuss the three principles of justice outlined in the chapter? Explain each with examples.
Page 66
Does the principle of considering the special needs of people conflict with the principle of equal treatment for all?
Page 66
How does Rawls use the idea of a veil of ignorance to argue that fair and just distribution can be defended on rational grounds?
Page 66
What are generally considered to be the basic minimum requirements of people for living a healthy and productive life? What is the responsibility of governments in trying to ensure this minimum to all?
Page 66
Which of the following arguments could be used to justify state action to provide basic minimum conditions of life to all citizens?
Answer: Providing all citizens with a basic minimum standard of living is one way of ensuring equality of opportunity.
Page 66
Additional Practice Questions
Explain how justice as fairness differs from utilitarian perspectives of justice.
mediumAnswer: Justice as fairness, particularly in John Rawls' theory, focuses on principles of equality and individual rights, advocating for a society where social inequalities are arranged to benefit the least advantaged. In contrast, utilitarian perspectives prioritize the greatest good for the greatest number, which can lead to the sacrifice of individual rights if it benefits the majority.
Discuss the role of government in ensuring social justice, especially in the context of economic disparity.
mediumAnswer: Governments are responsible for creating policies that reduce economic disparities by redistributing resources and opportunities. This involves legislating affirmative action, ensuring access to basic needs like education and healthcare, and implementing equitable taxation systems to support the underprivileged.
How can social justice be achieved in a multicultural society with varying definitions of justice?
hardAnswer: Achieving social justice in a multicultural society involves accommodating diverse cultural values while ensuring that universal human rights are upheld. This requires a legal framework that respects cultural differences but does not allow them to infringe upon the basic rights and freedoms of individuals.
Analyze the potential conflicts and resolutions between individual rights and collective well-being in the pursuit of social justice.
hardAnswer: Conflicts often arise when individual rights, such as property rights, come into tension with collective goals like economic equality. Resolutions can include legal reforms that balance property rights with social welfare obligations, ensuring that individual freedoms do not undermine societal well-being.
What is the significance of the principle of proportionality in justice, and how can it be effectively implemented?
mediumAnswer: The principle of proportionality in justice ensures that rewards and punishments are commensurate with the actions performed. It can be implemented through legal frameworks that consider the context and impact of actions when determining outcomes, thereby ensuring fairness and deterring inequitable practices.