Loading PDF...
Chapter Analysis
Intermediate10 pages • EnglishQuick Summary
This chapter discusses the strategies and debates surrounding India's planned economic development after Independence. It explores the conflicting ideologies between public and private sectors in the development process. The chapter highlights the major decisions involved in the country’s first few Five Year Plans and the role of the Planning Commission. Furthermore, it addresses the socio-political implications of various economic policies and how they aimed to balance industrial growth with social welfare【4:0†class-12-political-science-part-2-chapter-3.pdf】.
Key Topics
- •Bombay Plan
- •Five Year Plans
- •Role of Planning Commission
- •Industrialization
- •Economic Policies Post-Independence
- •Contradictions in Development Strategies
- •State vs. Private Sector Debate
- •Socialist vs. Capitalist Models
Learning Objectives
- ✓Understand the historical context of India's economic planning post-Independence
- ✓Compare and contrast different economic models that influenced India's planning
- ✓Analyze the key figures and their contributions to India’s economic development
- ✓Evaluate the outcomes and challenges of the early Five Year Plans
- ✓Identify the reasons for transitioning from a planned economy to a more liberalized one
- ✓Discuss the socio-political implications of economic policies in India
Questions in Chapter
Which of these statements about the Bombay Plan is incorrect?
Answer: (d) It supported strongly the idea of planning.
Page 52
Which of the following ideas did not form part of the early phase of India's development policy?
Answer: (b) Liberalisation
Page 52
The idea of planning in India was drawn from?
Page 52
What were the major differences in the approach towards development at the time of Independence? Has the debate been resolved?
Page 52
What was the major thrust of the First Five Year Plan? In which ways did the Second Plan differ from the first one?
Page 52
What is the contradiction that the author is talking about? What would be the political implications of a contradiction like this?
Page 53
Additional Practice Questions
Discuss the role of P.C. Mahalanobis in India's economic planning.
mediumAnswer: P.C. Mahalanobis was instrumental in shaping India's Second Five Year Plan which emphasized on industrialization and development of heavy industries. His approach, known as the Mahalanobis model, was aimed at rapid industrialization by prioritizing investment in the capital goods sector.
Explain the impact of the Soviet model on India's planning strategy.
hardAnswer: The Soviet model advocated for a centrally planned economy, which influenced Nehru and other Indian leaders who favored state control of resources and major industries. This led to the establishment of the Planning Commission and the adoption of Five Year Plans to direct resource allocation.
Analyze the socio-economic challenges faced during the implementation of the early Five Year Plans in India.
hardAnswer: The early Five Year Plans faced challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, shortage of resources, and balancing industrial growth with agricultural development. The emphasis on heavy industries led to neglect of the rural sector, posing a challenge for equitable growth.
What were the criticisms of the Planning Commission's approach to development?
mediumAnswer: Critics argued that the Planning Commission had an urban bias and favored industry over agriculture, causing disparities. It was also criticized for its centralized approach and inability to address the local needs effectively.
Discuss the transition from the Planning Commission to NITI Aayog.
easyAnswer: In 2015, the Planning Commission was replaced by NITI Aayog, which aimed at involving states in economic policy making in India. It represented a shift from a top-down to a more cooperative federal structure.